02.47

PALEOBIOLOGY




Biology: PALEOBIOLOGY: THE PRECAMBRIAN: LIFE'S GENESIS AND SPREAD


Table of Contents


Origin of the Earth and Life | Is There Life on Mars, Venus, Anywhere
Else?? | The Origins of Multicellularity | The Precambrian


Learning Objectives | Terms | Review Questions | class="Hyperlink__Char">Links | References 


 



image


Image of the precambrian reduced in size from class="Hyperlink__Char">http://www.uta.edu/geology/geol1425earth_system/images/gaia_chapter_11/ArcheanLandscape.jpg.



image


One way to represent geological time. Note the break during the precambrian.
If the vertical scale was truly to scale the precambrian would account
for 7/8 of the graphic. This image is
from class="Hyperlink__Char">http://www.clearlight.com/~mhieb/WVFossils/GeolTimeScale.html.


Origin of the Earth and Life


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char" style=" text-decoration: none">Scientific estimates place the origin of the Universe at between 10
and 20 bill
ion years ago. The theory currently with the most acceptance is the class="Hyperlink__Char">Big Bang Theory, the idea that all matter in the Universe existed in a cosmic egg
(smaller than the size of a modern hydrogen atom) that exploded, forming
the Universe. Recent discoveries from the Space Telescope and other
devices suggest this theory smay need some modification. Evidence for
the Big Bang includes:


1) The Red Shift: when stars/galaxies are moving away from us the energy they emit
is shifted to the red side of the visible-light spectrum. Those moving
towards us are shifted to the violet side. This shift is an example
of the Doppler effect. Similar effects are observed when listening to
a train whistle-- it will sound higher (shorter wavelengths) approaching
and lower (longer wavelengths) as it moves away. Likewise red wavelengths
are longer than violet ones. Most galaxies appear to be moving away
from ours.


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char" style=" text-decoration: none">2) Background radiation: two Bell Labs scientists discovered that in interstellar space there
is a slight background radiation, thought to be the residual afterblast
remnant of the Big Bang.


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char">Soon
after the Big Bang the major forces (such as gravity, weak nuclear force,
strong nuclear force, etc.) differentiated. While in the cosmic egg,
scientists think that matter and energy as we understand them did not
exist, but rather they formed soon after the bang. After 10 million
to 1 billion years the universe became clumpy, with matter beginning
to accumulate into solar systems. One of those solar systems, ours,
began to form approximately 5 billion years ago, with a large "protostar"
(that became our sun) in the center. The planets were in orbits some
distance from the star, their increasing gravitational fields sweeping
stray debris into larger and larger planetesimals that eventually formed
planets.


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char">The
processes of
radioactive decay class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char"> and
heat generated by the impact of planetesimals heated the Earth, which
then began to differentiate into a "cooled" outer cooled crust
(of silicon, oxygen and other relatively light elements) and increasingly
hotter inner areas (composed of the heavier and denser elements such
as iron and nickel). Impact (asteroid, comet, planetismals) and the
beginnings of volcanism released water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane,
ammonia and other gases into a developing atmosphere. Sometime "soon"
after this, life on earth began.


Where did life originate and how?


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char" style="
text-decoration: none;">Extra-terrestrial: In 1969, a meteorite (left-over bits from the origin of the solar
system) landed near Allende, Mexico. The Allende Meteorite (and others
of its sort) have been analyzed and found to contain
class="Hyperlink__Char">amino acids, the building blocks of class="Hyperlink__Char">proteins, one of the four organic molecule groups basic to all life. The idea
of panspermia hypothesized that life originated out in space and came
to earth inside a meteorite. Recently, this idea has been revived as
Cosmic Ancestry. The amino acids recovered from meteorites are in a
group known as exotics: they do not occur in the chemical systems of
living things. The ET theory is now not considered by most scientists
to be correct, although the August 1996 discovery of the Martian meteorite
and its possible fossils have revived thought of life elsewhere in the
Solar System.


Supernatural class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char">:
Since science is an attempt to measure and study the natural world,
this theory is outside science (at least our current understanding of
science). Science classes deal with science, and this idea is in the
category of not-science.


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char" style="
text-decoration: none;">Organic Chemical Evolution: Until the mid-1800's scientists thought organic chemicals (those
with a C-C skeleton) could only form by the actions of living things.
A French scientist heated crystals of a mineral (a mineral is by definition
inorganic), and discovered that they formed urea (an organic chemical)
when they cooled. Russian scientist and academecian
class="Hyperlink__Char">A.I. Oparin, in 1922, hypothesized that cellular life was preceeded by a period
of chemical evolution. These chemicals, he argued, must have arisen
spontaneously under conditions exisitng billions of years ago (and quite
unlike current conditions).



image


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char" style=" text-decoration: none">Ingredients used in Miller's experiments, simple molecules thought at the time to
have existed on the Earth billions of years ago.
Image from Purves
et al., Life: The Science of Biology, 4th Edition, by Sinauer Associates
(http://www.sinauer.com/) and WH Freeman ( class="Hyperlink__Char">http://www.whfreeman.com/),
used with permission.


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char">In
1950, then-graduate student Stanley Miller designed an
class="Hyperlink__Char">experimental test for Oparin's hypothesis. Oparin's original hypothesis called for
: 1) little or no free oxygen (oxygen not bonded to other elements);
and 2) C H O and N in abundance. Studies of modern volcanic eruptions
support inference of the existence of such an atmosphere. Miller discharged
an electric spark into a mixture thought to resemble the primordial
composition of the atmosphere. From the water receptacle, designed to
model an ancient ocean, Miller recovered
class="Hyperlink__Char">amino acids. Subsequent modifications of the atmosphere have produced representatives
or precursors of all four organic macromolecular classes.


image


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char" style=" text-decoration: none">A diagrammatic representation of Miller's experimental app class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char">aratus.
Image from Purves et al., Life: The Science of Biology, 4th Edition, by Sinauer Associates
(http://www.sinauer.com/) and WH Freeman ( class="Hyperlink__Char">http://www.whfreeman.com/),
used with permission.


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char" style=" text-decoration: none">The primordial Earth was a very different place than today, with greater
amounts of energy, stronger storms, etc. The oceans were a "soup"
of organic compounds that formed by inorganic processes (although this
soup would not taste umm ummm
good). Miller's (and subsequent) experiments have not proven life originated in this way,
only that conditions thought to have existed over 3 billion years ago
were such that the spontaneous (inorganic) formation of organic
class="Hyperlink__Char">macromolecules could have taken place. The simple inorganic molecules that Miller
placed into his apparatus, produced a variety of complex molecules:



image



image



image


Molecules recovered from Miller's and similar experiments. Image from Purves et al., class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char">Life: The Science of Biology, 4th Edition, by Sinauer Associates
(http://www.sinauer.com/) and WH Freeman ( class="Hyperlink__Char">http://www.whfreeman.com/),
used with permission.


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char" style=" text-decoration: none">The interactions of these molecules would have increased as their
concentrations increased. Reactions would have led to the building of
larger, more complex molecules. A pre-cellular life would have began
with the
formation of class="Hyperlink__Char">nucleic acids. Chemicals made by these nucleic acids would have remained in proximity
to the nucleic acids. Eventually the pre-cells would have been enclosed
in a lipid-protein membrane, which would have resulted in the first
cells.


Biochemically, living systems are separated
from other chemical systems by three things.



  1. The capacity for replication from one generation
    to another. Most organi
    sms today use DNA as the hereditary material, although recent evidence
    (
    ribozymes) suggests that RNA may have been the first nucleic acid system to
    have formed. Nobel laureate Wa
    lter Gilbert refers to this as the RNA world.

  2. The presence of enzymes and other complex molecules
    essential to the processes needed by living systems. Miller's experiment
    showed how these could possibly form.

  3. A membrane that separates the internal chemic class="Normal__Char">als from the external
    chemical environment. This also delimits the cell from not-cell areas.
    The work of Sidney W. Fox has produced
    class="Hyperlink__Char">proteinoid spheres, which while not cells, suggest a possible route from chemical to cellular
    life.


class="Hyperlink__Char">Fossil evidence supports the origins of life on earth earlier than 3.5 billion
years ago. The North Pole microfossils from Australia (the Apex Chert)
are complex enough that more primitive cells must have existed earlier.
From rocks of the Ishua Super Group in Greenland come possibly the earliest
cells, as much as 3.8 billion years old. The oldest known rocks on Earth
are 3.96 billion years old and are from Arctic Canada. Thus, life appears
to have begun soon after the cooling of the Earth and formation of the
atmosphere and oceans.


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char">These
ancient fossils occur in marine rocks, such as limestones and sandstones,
that formed in ancient oceans. The organisms living today that are most
similar to ancient life forms are the
class="Hyperlink__Char">archaebacteria. This group is today restricted to marginal environments. Recent
discoveries of bacteria at mid-ocean ridges add yet another possible
origin for life: at these mid-ocean geological structures where heat
and molten rock rise to the Earth's surface.


Is there life on Mars, Venus, anywhere else??


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char" style=" text-decoration: none">The proximity of the earth to the sun, the make-up of the earth's
crust (silicate mixtures, presence of water, etc.) and the size of the
earth suggest we may be unique in our own solar system, at least. Mars
is sma
ller, farther from the sun, has a lower gravitational field (which
would keep the atmosphere from escaping into space) and does show evidence
of running water sometime in its past. If life did start on Mars, however,
there appears to be no life (as we know it) today. Venus, the second
planet, is closer to the sun, and appears similar to earth in many respects.
Carbon dioxide build-up has resulted in a "greenhouse planet"
with strong storms and strongly acidic rain. Of all planets in the solar
system, Venus is most likely to have some form of C-based life. The
outer planets are as yet too poorly understood, although it seems unlikely
that Jupiter or Saturn harbor life as we know it. Like Goldilocks would
say "Venus is too hot, Mars is too cold, the Earth is just right!"


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char">Mars:
In August 1996, evidence of life on Mars (or at least the chemistry
of life), was announced.
class="Hyperlink__Char">Click here to view that article and related ones class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char">.
The results of years of study are inconclusive at best. The purported
bacteria are much smaller than any known bacteria on earth, were not
hollow, and most could possibly have been mineral in origin. However,
many scientists consider that the chemistry of life appears to have
been established on Mars. Search for Martian life (or its remains) continues.


The Origins of Multicellularity


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char" style=" text-decoration: none">The oldest accepted prokaryote fossils date to 3.5 billion years;
Eukaryotic fossils to between 750 million years and possibly as old
as 1.
2-1.5 billion years. Multicellular fossils, purportedly of animals,
have been recovered from 750Ma rocks in various parts of the world.
The first eukaryotes were undoubtedly
class="Hyperlink__Char">Protistans, a group that is thought to have given rise to the other eukaryotic
kingdoms. Multicellularity allows specialization of function, for example
class="Hyperlink__Char">muscle fibers are specialized for contraction, class="Hyperlink__Char">neuron cells for transmission of nerve messages.


The Precambrian


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char" style=" text-decoration: none">The Archean Eon encompasses the time from the formation of the earth until 2.5 billion
years ago. The rocks formed during this eon are the most ancient rocks
known, up to 3.96 billion years old. The nature of this rock inducates
that there were/are even older rocks that, if they still exist, have
yet to be located and dated. Perhaps the biggest development during
the Archean was the first appearance of life. The earliest forms of
life were simple prokaryotic cells, in a few cases remarkably similar
to living prokaryotic forms (at least in terms of observable cell structure
and size). Fossil evidence supports the origins of life on earth earlier
than 3.5 billion years ago. Specimens from the North Pole region of
Western Australia are of such diversity and apparent complexity that
even more primitive cells must have existed earlier. Rocks of the Ishua
Super Group in Greenland yield possibly the fossil remains of the earliest
cells, 3.8 billion years old. Life appears to have begun soon after
the cooling of the Earth and formation of its atmosphere and oceans.


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char">These
ancient fossils occur in marine rocks, such as limestones and sandstones,
that formed in ancient oceans. The organisms living today that are most
similar to ancient life forms are the
class="Hyperlink__Char">archaebacteria (the archaea in modern usage). This group is today restricted to
marginal environments. Recent discoveries of life at mid-ocean ridges
add yet another possible place of origin: at these mid-ocean ridges
where heat and molten rock rise to the earth's surface.


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char">Archaea
and Eubacteria are similar in size and shape. When we do recover fossilized
bacteria those are the two features we will usually see: size and shape.
How can we distinguish between the two groups: the use of molecular
fossils that will point to either (but not both) groups. Such a chemical
fossil has been found and its presence in the Ishua rocks of Greenland
(3.8 billion years old) suggests that the archeans were present at that
time.



image


Microfossils from the Apex Chert, North Pole,
Australia. These organisms are Archean in age, approximately 3.465 billion
ye
ars old, and resemble filamentous cyanobacteria. Image from class="Hyperlink__Char">http://www.astrobiology.ucla.edu/ESS116/L15/1515%20Apex%20Chert.jpg.


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char" style=" text-decoration: none">Many of the ancient class="Hyperlink__Char">phototrophs and heterotrophic bacteria lived in colonial associations known as class="Hyperlink__Char">stromatolites. Cyanobacteria occur on the outer surface, with other photosynthetic bacteria (anoxic,
which do not produce oxygen from their photosynthesis process)) below
them. Below these phototrophs are layers of heterotrophic bacteria.
The layers in the stromatolites are alternating biogenic and sedimentologic
in origin. Stromatolites become more common in the Proterozoic and decline
during the Cambrian. Modern stromatolites are found in marine environments
where the presence of herbivorous :grazers" is limited.



image


Image of Sharks Bay, Australia extant stromatolites,
a cross section of one of these structures, and a closeup of the cyanobacteria
t
hat make up the bulk of the feature. Image from class="Hyperlink__Char">http://www.dme.wa.gov.au/ancientfossils/sharkbay2.jpg.



image


Diagram of a stromatolite and its structure
as a series of alternating layers of
algae and sediments. Image from class="Hyperlink__Char">http://www.uta.edu/geology/geol1425earth_system/images/gaia_chapter_10/stromatolites.htm.



image


A fossil stromatolite from the North Pole deposits in Western Australia. These deposits are approximately
3.5 billion years old.
Image from class="Hyperlink__Char">http://www.carleton.ca/~tpatters/teaching/intro/precambrian/precambrian7.html.


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char" style=" text-decoration: none">The Proterozoic Eon class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char"> covers
the time span from 2.5 billion to 544 million years ago. Simple, prokaryotic
cells still dominated the world's environments until the evolution of
simple eukaryotes approximately 1.5-1.2 billion years ago. With the
appearance of eukaryotes comes the development of sexual reproduction,
which greatly increased the variation that natural selection could operate
on. A major enbvironmental change, initiated by living things, was the
development of oxygenic photosynthesis. This led to increasing oxygen
levels during later Proterozoic. Geologists refer to the "great
iron crisis" when the rising levels of oxygen in the world's oceans
caused the formation or iron oxide (Fe
2O3), often
preserved as the banded iron formation (an important commercial source
of iron).



image


Banded iron formation, illustrating the alternating
layers of magnetite and hematite
(the red iron) and chert. Image from class="Hyperlink__Char">http://www.agso.gov.au/education/factsheet/ironform.html.


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char" style=" text-decoration: none">The first protist (eukaryotic) fossils have commonly been thought
to be in rocks approxi
mately 1.2-1.4 billion years old (Proterozoic) from the Bitter Springs
Formation in Australia. The Bitter Springs deposits also yield a variety
of bacteria and cyanobacterial types. Recent study of the Bitter Springs
eukaryote fossils suggests they may in fact be cyanobactria. A group
of undoubted eukaryote fossils is the "acritarchs". This term
applies to resting cycts of single-celled algae. Acrtitarchs have been
recovered from sediments that are as old as 1.8 billion years.


class="Hyperlink__Char">Multicellular protists appeared in the class="Hyperlink__Char">fossil record more than 600 million years ago near the very end of the precambrian.
This time is referred to as the Vendian Period (650 to 544 million years
ago), and is characterized by the appearance of soft-bodied animal fossils.
Multicellular animal fossils and burrows (presumably made by unknown
multicellular animals) first appear 700 million years ago, during the
late precambrian time. All known Proterozoic animal fossils had soft
body parts: no shells or hard (and hence preservable as fossils) parts.
There are some paleontologists who suspect that the Vendian faunas were
reduced by an extinction event, possibly related to massive glaciation,
at the close of the vendian time. In any event, many animals in the
Vendian assemblages are quite unlike anything living today, while others
can be traced to extant phyla.



image


Dickinsonia class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char"> sp.
a Vendian animal fossil thought related to the annelid worms.

Image is from http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/vendian/dickinsonia.jpg.
 



image


Spriggina sp. an enigmatic fossil from the Ediacara Hills in Australia. This
fossil has been classified with the annelid worms as well as recently
an unknown group of arthropods.
Image from class="Hyperlink__Char">http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/vendian/spriggina.gif.


class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char" style=" text-decoration: none">Some problemmatic fossils, thought by some paleobotanists to be multicellular
algae, have been found in rocks approximately one billion years old.
class="Normal_0020_0028Web_0029__Char">However,
the multicellular algae are usually classified based on their pigments,
which commonly are not preserved in the fossils.



image


Reconstruction of the sea floor during the
Vendian times when the Ediacaran organisms thrived.
Image from class="Hyperlink__Char">http://www.carleton.ca/~tpatters/teaching/intro/cambrian/cambrianex8.html.



image


Orientation of continents in class="Hyperlink__Char">Rodinia supercontinent at the close of the precambrian. Image from class="Hyperlink__Char">http://astro.sau.edu/~earth/html/md-tectonics.html


Learning Objectives



  • Describe the major scientific ideas on the origin of life and the
    evidence supporting each one.

  • List the basic physical and biological requirements for life. What
    planet(s) would these be available on?

  • What did Miller's experiment prove? What did it NOT prove? How does
    this experiment fit with each of the hyoptheses of the origin of life
    discussed h
    ere?

  • What was the world of the Archean like? How about that of the Proterozoic?
    What major biological development paved the way for the modern world?


Terms




 


Review Questions



  1. Which of these is not a type of cell? a) bacterium; b) amoeba; c)
    sperm; d) virus

  2. The Earth's early atmosphere apparently lacked ___. a) oxygen; b)
    carbon dioxide; c) water vapor; d) ammonia

  3. The oldest fossil forms of life are most similar to _____. a)
    animals; b) modern bacteria; c) archaebacteria; d) fungi


Links



References


Miller S. L. 1953 A production of amino acids
under possibl
e primitive Earth conditions, Science; 117: 528-529.


Oparin, A. I. 1961 Life: its nature, origin and development.
translated from Russian by Ann Synge. Oliver & Boyd, 207p.


Oparin, A. I., 1968 (translated from a book published in Russian in
1966), "
Genesis and Evolutionary Development of
Life
," Academic Press, New York, 203 p.


Schopf, J. W. 1999 Cradle of Life: The Discovery of earth's
Earliest Fossils
. Princeton University Press, 367 p.


 


All text contents © 2001, by Nolvyhindarto.bio, all rights reserved.
Use for educational purposes is encouraged.


Email:
nolvyhindarto@gmail.com













0 komentar: